CORRUPT GEORGIA COURTS



corruptgacourts.com is currently under construction.

Thank you for your patience while we build our website. Please visit us again.

 

This site will document the incompetence, judicial collusion, and unlawful activity of the Gwinnett County Georgia Court System.  All information will be accompanied by documented proof of their corruption and unlawful behavior.

While I'm building this site I've included a section below, called "The Players", as an example of what will be published here.  You should also download and read the two documents at the bottom of this page.  This is only a sample of the documents, emails, video and voice recordings that will be provided as evidence.

FIGHT CORRUPTION!!

The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines "corruption" as:

Function: noun
1 : impairment of integrity, virtue, or moral principle : DEPRAVITY
2 : DECAY, DECOMPOSITION
3 : inducement to wrong by improper or unlawful means
4 : a departure from the original or from what is pure or correct


The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines "unlawful" as:

Function: adjective
1 : not lawful : ILLEGAL
2 : not morally right or conventional


The Players:

1.  Tami Alvarez - After swindling me out of $10,000 I filed a civil lawsuit against her.  Her response was to file FALSE stalking charges on the very same day she received the notice of my civil complaint .  With the assistance of Gwinnett County, this gave her the collateral advantage she needed in the civil case.  A review of her history shows a consistent pattern of this type of behavior.

2.  The Gwinnett County Solicitor - Their failure to properly investigate false allegations and a desire to "rush to judgment", so that the numbers reported to the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting System look good, scheduled a warrant hearing.  No investigation, no interviews, no nothing.  I do find it amazing is that someone in the Gwinnett County Solicitor’s Office actually told my Attorney, Mr. Daniel V. Klump, (678) 990-3250, that Judge Jennifer Mann made a mistake and the case should have never been sent to the Solicitor’s Office.  The Solicitor also asked the court to unlawfully move me to a "Dead Docket" (NOTE:  A defendant must agree to be placed on a Dead Docket - I never agreed to this and was never notified that my case was being "Dead Docket'ed".)

3.  Judge Jennifer Mann - A complete incompetent who  accepted "ESP testimony" during the warrant hearing.  She herself asked Ms. Alvarez if she (Alvarez) had seen me "stalking" her.  Ms. Alvarez' reply "No (pause) But I felt it".  On this testimony alone the nightmare began and I was immediately taken into custody.  (NOTE: There were actually TWO Judges at my hearing...but the second one, a male, never identified himself or spoke during the hearing.  Nor is there any record of his being there.  He simply stood beside Judge Mann like a statue.  Strange proceedings to say the least.)

4.  Attorney Pamela Britt - My court appointed lawyer; who refused to meet with me prior to the warrant hearing.  When I insisted we discuss the case PRIOR to the hearing her response was an emphatic "that's not necessary" and she refused to talk more than five minutes on the phone.  Her arrival at the warrant hearing was the first time we met and then we spent less than two minutes speaking with one another.  Had I not prepared a list of questions for her to ask Ms. Alvarez she would undoubtedly have done nothing (how could she? - she never prepared and didn't have a clue what was going on).  I truly pity anyone who gets assigned this poor excuse for an attorney.

5.  Attorney Dan Klump (my criminal attorney) - In the beginning he promised me everything: "I'll get the case dropped", "I do as you ask and get a court date", I'll do this, I'll do that - he did NOTHING!  After a few months he refused, at every turn, to get me a court date.  When asked why, he would simply reply that it wasn't necessary.  Apparently Mr. Klump doesn't think a man's reputation and false imprisonment are important issues.  I fired him (I should have done it sooner).

6.  Judge Joseph C. Iannazzone - For two years I demanded a jury trial; as is my right.  For two years my requests were completely ignored.  Judge Iannazzone, with the guidance and assistance of the Gwinnett County Solicitor intentionally denied me my rights under Amendment VI (the Sixth Amendment) of the U.S. Constitution.  (NOTE: The Supreme Court has ruled that these rights are so fundamental and important that they are protected in state courts by the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.  This means the court  INTENTIONALLY denied me my Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights.)  Judge Iannazone also unlawfully moved me to a Dead Docket at the request of the Solicitor (see the second downloadable document below).

 

(NOTE:  The following documents are in Adobe PDF format)

Click here for a letter I wrote to to Congressman Sensenbrenner who was the head of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary in October 2005. 

Click here for a copy of the motion I filed with Judge Iannazone requesting I be removed from the Dead Docket.  When this motion was heard, I informed Judge Iannazone that I have ALWAYS wanted a Jury trial.  Judge Iannazone's verbal response, in open court, was "you're going to get your wish".  Guess what? More than six months later and I still don't have a trial date!  To those who read this document: pay particular attention to Paragraph 5 where it's shown that the Solicitor acted unlawfully.  To date, no charges have been filed against the Solicitor for their unlawful behavior (gee ... what a surprise).